You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0171904 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matti Wilks, Clive J. C. Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 8 | 19% |
Spain | 6 | 14% |
United States | 5 | 12% |
New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Russia | 2 | 5% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 79% |
Scientists | 7 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 516 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 108 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 98 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 8% |
Researcher | 40 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 3% |
Other | 57 | 11% |
Unknown | 156 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 36 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 26 | 5% |
Engineering | 24 | 5% |
Other | 133 | 26% |
Unknown | 176 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 614. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#37,634
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#627
of 225,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#796
of 321,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#15
of 4,427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.