| Title |
Ten reasons for performing hemodynamic monitoring using transesophageal echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4716-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Vignon, Tobias M. Merz, Antoine Vieillard-Baron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 71% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#691,932
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#646
of 5,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,330
of 315,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.