↓ Skip to main content

Computational Mechanics of the Heart

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Elasticity, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 127)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Computational Mechanics of the Heart
Published in
Journal of Elasticity, July 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1011084330767
Authors

M. P. Nash, P. J. Hunter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 37 40%
Mathematics 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Materials Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2008.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Elasticity
#15
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,222
of 39,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Elasticity
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.