↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and mortality: Individual participant data meta-analysis of standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 26916 individuals from a European consortium

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D and mortality: Individual participant data meta-analysis of standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 26916 individuals from a European consortium
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0170791
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Gaksch, Rolf Jorde, Guri Grimnes, Ragnar Joakimsen, Henrik Schirmer, Tom Wilsgaard, Ellisiv B. Mathiesen, Inger Njølstad, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Winfried März, Marcus E. Kleber, Andreas Tomaschitz, Martin Grübler, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Elias F. Gudmundsson, Tamara B. Harris, Mary F. Cotch, Thor Aspelund, Vilmundur Gudnason, Femke Rutters, Joline W. J. Beulens, Esther van ‘t Riet, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M. Dekker, Diana Grove-Laugesen, Lars Rejnmark, Markus A. Busch, Gert B. M. Mensink, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Michael Thamm, Karin M. A. Swart, Ingeborg A. Brouwer, Paul Lips, Natasja M. van Schoor, Christopher T. Sempos, Ramón A. Durazo-Arvizu, Zuzana Škrabáková, Kirsten G. Dowling, Kevin D. Cashman, Mairead Kiely, Stefan Pilz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 60 27%
Unknown 57 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 75 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#305,207
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,356
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,320
of 323,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#106
of 4,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.