↓ Skip to main content

Service impact of a national clinical leadership development programme: findings from a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Management, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Service impact of a national clinical leadership development programme: findings from a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Nursing Management, July 2013
DOI 10.1111/jonm.12133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard M. Fealy, Martin S. McNamara, Mary Casey, Tom O'Connor, Declan Patton, Louise Doyle, Christina Quinlan

Abstract

The study reported here was part of a larger study, which evaluated a national clinical leadership development programme with reference to resources, participant experiences, participant outcomes and service impact. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the programme's service impact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 15%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Management
#1,005
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,674
of 209,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Management
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.