You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Service impact of a national clinical leadership development programme: findings from a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nursing Management, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/jonm.12133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gerard M. Fealy, Martin S. McNamara, Mary Casey, Tom O'Connor, Declan Patton, Louise Doyle, Christina Quinlan |
Abstract |
The study reported here was part of a larger study, which evaluated a national clinical leadership development programme with reference to resources, participant experiences, participant outcomes and service impact. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the programme's service impact. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 30% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Management
#1,005
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,674
of 209,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Management
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.