You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impaired default network functional connectivity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a1aafe |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasmeer P. Chhatwal, Aaron P. Schultz, Keith Johnson, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Clifford Jack, Beau M. Ances, Caroline A. Sullivan, Stephen P. Salloway, John M. Ringman, Robert A. Koeppe, Daniel S. Marcus, Paul Thompson, Andrew J. Saykin, Stephen Correia, Peter R. Schofield, Christopher C. Rowe, Nick C. Fox, Adam M. Brickman, Richard Mayeux, Eric McDade, Randall Bateman, Anne M. Fagan, Allison M. Goate, Chengjie Xiong, Virginia D. Buckles, John C. Morris, Reisa A. Sperling |
| Abstract |
To investigate default mode network (DMN) functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) in a large cross-sectional cohort of subjects from families harboring pathogenic presenilin-1 (PSEN1), presenilin-2 (PSEN2), and amyloid precursor protein (APP) mutations participating in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 22% |
| Researcher | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 43 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 19% |
| Psychology | 20 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,672,132
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#6,709
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,664
of 209,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#67
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.