| Title |
Factors driving population recovery of the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in the UK: implications for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1320-1 |
| Authors |
Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux, Katherine L. Boughey, Kate E. Barlow, Gareth Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 37% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 87% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#837,365
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#92
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,056
of 323,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.