| Title |
Comparing the foraging strategies of a seabird predator when recovering from a drastic climatic event
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-017-3082-4 |
| Authors |
Milton R. Avalos, Jaime A. Ramos, Margarida Soares, Filipe R. Ceia, Ana I. Fagundes, Cátia Gouveia, Dília Menezes, Vítor H. Paiva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,721,655
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#494
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,670
of 315,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.