| Title |
A pilot study to assess lead exposure from routine consumption of coffee and tea from ceramic mugs: comparison to California Safe Harbor Levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Safety and Risk, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40550-017-0049-7 |
| Authors |
Grace L. Anderson, Lindsey Garnick, Mai S. Fung, Shannon H. Gaffney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Comoros | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 92% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,326,238
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Food Safety and Risk
#4
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,867
of 426,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Safety and Risk
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them