↓ Skip to main content

Hung out to dry? Intraspecific variation in water loss in a hibernating bat

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Hung out to dry? Intraspecific variation in water loss in a hibernating bat
Published in
Oecologia, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00442-017-3837-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon J. Klüg-Baerwald, R. Mark Brigham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 46%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,041
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,622
of 326,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.