| Title |
Exploring the Diversity of Conceptualizations of Work (Dis)ability: A Scoping Review of Published Definitions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-013-9459-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valérie Lederer, Patrick Loisel, Michèle Rivard, François Champagne |
| Abstract |
Researchers are confronted to numerous definitions of work ability/disability, influenced by their context of emergence, discipline, purpose, underlying paradigm and relationship to time. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the concept through a systematic scoping review and the development of an integrative concept map of work (dis)ability. The research questions are: How has work (dis)ability been conceptualized from the perspectives of research, practice, policy and industry in the published scientific literature? How has the conceptualization of work (dis)ability evolved over time? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#323
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,181
of 214,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.