↓ Skip to main content

Re‐conceptualizing Risk in Genetic Counseling: Implications for Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Re‐conceptualizing Risk in Genetic Counseling: Implications for Clinical Practice
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10897-010-9279-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jehannine C. Austin

Abstract

Risk communication is an important component of genetic counseling. However, many authors have noted that after genetic counseling, subjective risk frequently does not match the objective risk provided by the counselor. This inevitably leads to the conclusion that the risk communication process was not "effective". There has been much discussion about how this problem can be better addressed, such that our clients recall numeric risks more accurately after genetic counseling. This article draws on the risk and probability literature from other fields (including psychology, economics, philosophy and climate change) to deconstruct the concepts of "risk" and risk perception to attempt to expand upon and develop thought and discussion about and investigation of the risk communication process in genetic counseling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Psychology 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,557,945
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#115
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,233
of 167,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.