| Title |
Various species of Pyricularia constitute a robust clade distinct from Magnaporthesalvinii and its relatives in Magnaporthaceae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Plant Pathology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10327-013-0477-z |
| Authors |
Nobuaki Murata, Takayuki Aoki, Motoaki Kusaba, Yukio Tosa, Izumi Chuma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#32
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,569
of 197,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them