| Title |
Classification and parasitic specialization of blast fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Plant Pathology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10327-014-0513-7 |
| Authors |
Yukio Tosa, Izumi Chuma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 64% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#32
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,003
of 221,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.