You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003607 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shafqat Ahmad, Gull Rukh, Tibor V. Varga, Ashfaq Ali, Azra Kurbasic, Dmitry Shungin, Ulrika Ericson, Robert W. Koivula, Audrey Y. Chu, Lynda M. Rose, Andrea Ganna, Qibin Qi, Alena Stančáková, Camilla H. Sandholt, Cathy E. Elks, Gary Curhan, Majken K. Jensen, Rulla M. Tamimi, Kristine H. Allin, Torben Jørgensen, Soren Brage, Claudia Langenberg, Mette Aadahl, Niels Grarup, Allan Linneberg, Guillaume Paré, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Nancy L. Pedersen, Michael Boehnke, Anders Hamsten, Karen L. Mohlke, Louis T. Pasquale, Oluf Pedersen, Robert A. Scott, Paul M. Ridker, Erik Ingelsson, Markku Laakso, Torben Hansen, Lu Qi, Nicholas J. Wareham, Daniel I. Chasman, Göran Hallmans, Frank B. Hu, Frida Renström, Marju Orho-Melander, Paul W. Franks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 26% |
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#789,256
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#525
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,204
of 214,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#10
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.