| Title |
Monkey Business? Development, Influence, and Ethics of Potentially Dual-Use Brain Science on the World Stage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-017-9308-9 |
| Authors |
Guillermo Palchik, Celeste Chen, James Giordano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 2 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,503,730
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#345
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,007
of 426,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.