↓ Skip to main content

Unraveling genomic variation from next generation sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Unraveling genomic variation from next generation sequencing data
Published in
BioData Mining, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0381-6-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgios A Pavlopoulos, Anastasis Oulas, Ernesto Iacucci, Alejandro Sifrim, Yves Moreau, Reinhard Schneider, Jan Aerts, Ioannis Iliopoulos

Abstract

Elucidating the content of a DNA sequence is critical to deeper understand and decode the genetic information for any biological system. As next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have become cheaper and more advanced in throughput over time, great innovations and breakthrough conclusions have been generated in various biological areas. Few of these areas, which get shaped by the new technological advances, involve evolution of species, microbial mapping, population genetics, genome-wide association studies (GWAs), comparative genomics, variant analysis, gene expression, gene regulation, epigenetics and personalized medicine. While NGS techniques stand as key players in modern biological research, the analysis and the interpretation of the vast amount of data that gets produced is a not an easy or a trivial task and still remains a great challenge in the field of bioinformatics. Therefore, efficient tools to cope with information overload, tackle the high complexity and provide meaningful visualizations to make the knowledge extraction easier are essential. In this article, we briefly refer to the sequencing methodologies and the available equipment to serve these analyses and we describe the data formats of the files which get produced by them. We conclude with a thorough review of tools developed to efficiently store, analyze and visualize such data with emphasis in structural variation analysis and comparative genomics. We finally comment on their functionality, strengths and weaknesses and we discuss how future applications could further develop in this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 2%
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 317 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 101 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 23%
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 22 6%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 24 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 203 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 19%
Computer Science 27 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 31 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,715,196
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#52
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,724
of 209,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.