↓ Skip to main content

Nondrinker Mortality Risk in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 707)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Nondrinker Mortality Risk in the United States
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11113-013-9268-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard G. Rogers, Patrick M. Krueger, Richard Miech, Elizabeth M. Lawrence, Robert Kemp

Abstract

The literature has shown that people who do not drink alcohol are at greater risk for death than light to moderate drinkers, yet the reasons for this remain largely unexplained. We examine whether variation in people's reasons for nondrinking explains the increased mortality. Our data come from the 1988-2006 National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality File (N= 41,076 individuals age 21 and above, of whom 10,421 died over the follow-up period). The results indicate that nondrinkers include several different groups that have unique mortality risks. Among abstainers and light drinkers the risk of mortality is the same as light drinkers for a subgroup who report that they do not drink because of their family upbringing, and moral/religious reasons. In contrast, the risk of mortality is higher than light drinkers for former drinkers who cite health problems or who report problematic drinking behaviors. Our findings address a notable gap in the literature and may inform social policies to reduce or prevent alcohol abuse, increase health, and lengthen life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Psychology 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#645,013
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#28
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,834
of 293,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.