↓ Skip to main content

The Origin of Deoxynucleosides in Brain: Implications for the Study of Neurogenesis and Stem Cell Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Origin of Deoxynucleosides in Brain: Implications for the Study of Neurogenesis and Stem Cell Therapy
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11095-006-9221-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reynold Spector, Conrad E. Johanson

Abstract

Detection of DNA synthesis in brain employing ((3)H)thymidine (((3)H)dT) or bromo deoxyuridine (BrdU) is widely used as a measure of the "birth" of cells in brain development, adult neurogenesis and neuronal stem cell replacement strategies. However, recent studies have raised serious questions about whether this methodology adequately measures the "birth" of cells in brain either quantitatively or in an interpretable way in comparative studies, or in stem cell investigations. To place these questions in perspective, we review deoxynucleoside synthesis and pharmacokinetics focusing on the barriers interfacing the blood-brain (cerebral capillaries) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (choroid plexus), and the mechanisms, molecular biology and location of the deoxynucleoside transport systems in the central nervous system. Brain interstitial fluid and CSF nucleoside homeostasis depend upon the activity of concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNT) on the 'central side' of the barrier cells and equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) on their 'plasma side.' With this information about nucleoside transporters, blood/CSF concentrations and metabolic pathways, we discuss the assumptions and weaknesses of using ((3)H)dT or BrdU methodologies alone for studying DNA synthesis in brain in the context of neurogenesis and potential stem cell therapy. We conclude that the use of ((3)H)dT and/or BrdU methodologies can be useful if their limitations are recognized and they are used in conjunction with independent methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,393,076
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#917
of 2,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,173
of 76,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#25
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.