↓ Skip to main content

Design-based stereological methods for estimating numbers of glomerular podocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design-based stereological methods for estimating numbers of glomerular podocytes
Published in
Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.aanat.2013.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor G. Puelles, Rebecca N. Douglas-Denton, Luise Cullen-McEwen, Bridgette J. McNamara, Firuz Salih, Jinhua Li, Michael D. Hughson, Wendy E. Hoy, Jens R. Nyengaard, John F. Bertram

Abstract

The podocyte depletion hypothesis has emerged as a unifying concept in glomerular pathology. According to this hypothesis podocyte depletion may be absolute (decrease in number of healthy mature podocytes), relative (fewer podocytes per unit of glomerular volume) or involve alterations to the specialized podocyte architecture (such as foot process effacement). To study and understand podocyte depletion it is important to be able to accurately and precisely count these cells. Here we present new design-based stereological methods for estimating podocyte number in individual glomeruli of known volume, and in average glomeruli. Both methods involve serial histological sectioning, triple label immunohistochemistry, laser confocal microscopy and cell counting with the optical disector/fractionator.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 22%
Professor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%