↓ Skip to main content

Association of osteonecrosis of the jaws and POEMS syndrome in a patient assuming rituximab

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of osteonecrosis of the jaws and POEMS syndrome in a patient assuming rituximab
Published in
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Allegra, Giacomo Oteri, Andrea Alonci, Francesco Bacci, Giuseppa Penna, Viviana Minardi, Valerio Maisano, Caterina Musolino

Abstract

POEMS syndrome, is a rare condition characterized by polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal proteinaemia, and skin lesions. We report a rare case of a patient affected by Waldenström macroglobulinemia, who developed POEMS syndrome and who presented at the time of diagnosis with oral manifestations of the lymphoma and an osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) after rituximab treatment. Although the etiology of ONJ is not known, it is likely that several factors are at play, including endothelial cell damage, decreased angiogenesis, and microvascular compromise. Our patient was treated with rituximab for a long period, and recent studies have demonstrated the possibility that rituximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 can exert part of its anti-tumor action, through its action on angiogenesis. Although our report does not allow identification of rituximab as a new risk factor for the onset of the ONJ, further studies seem necessary to exclude a role of the antibody in the alterations of angiogenesis that could lead to the development of the syndrome after rituximab treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
#388
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,561
of 209,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.