↓ Skip to main content

Value of β-d-glucan and Candida albicans germ tube antibody for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in patients with severe abdominal conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Value of β-d-glucan and Candida albicans germ tube antibody for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in patients with severe abdominal conditions
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2616-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristóbal León, Sergio Ruiz-Santana, Pedro Saavedra, Carmen Castro, Alejandro Úbeda, Ana Loza, Estrella Martín-Mazuelos, Armando Blanco, Vicente Jerez, Josep Ballús, Luis Álvarez-Rocha, Aránzazu Utande-Vázquez, Osvaldo Fariñas

Abstract

To assess the value of (1→3)-β-D: -glucan (BDG), Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) levels for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) and for differentiating Candida spp. colonization from infection in ICU patients with severe abdominal conditions (SAC). Prospective study of 176 non-neutropenic patients, with SAC at ICU admission, and expected to stay at least 7 days. Surveillance cultures and BDG, CAGTA, CRP, and PCT levels were performed on the third day of ICU stay and twice a week for four consecutive weeks. Patients were grouped into invasive candidiasis (IC), Candida colonization, and neither colonized/nor infected. The classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to predict IC in colonized patients. The discriminatory ability of the obtained prediction rule was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The probabilities of IC were 59.3 % for the terminal node of BDG greater than 259 pg/mL and 30.8 % for BDG less than 259 pg/mL and CAGTA positivity, whereas there was a 93.9 % probability in predicting the absence of IC for BDG less than 259 pg/mL and negative CAGTA. Using a cutoff of 30 % for IC probability, the prediction rule showed 90.3 % sensitivity, 54.8 % specificity, 42.4 % positive predictive value, and 93.9 % negative predictive value with an AUC of 0.78 (95 % confidence interval 0.76-0.81). Significant differences in CRP (p = 0.411) and PCT (p = 0.179) among the studied groups were not found. BDG with a positive test for CAGTA accurately differentiated Candida colonization from IC in patients with SAC, whereas CRP and PCT did not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Other 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,892,544
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,765
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,485
of 163,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.