↓ Skip to main content

A generalized algebraic difference approach allows an improved estimation of aboveground biomass dynamics of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Castanopsis sclerophylla forests

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
A generalized algebraic difference approach allows an improved estimation of aboveground biomass dynamics of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Castanopsis sclerophylla forests
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13595-016-0603-0
Authors

Xiaolu Tang, Lutz Fehrmann, Fengying Guan, David I. Forrester, Rubén Guisasola, César Pérez-Cruzado, Torsten Vor, Yuanchang Lu, Juan Gabriel Álvarez-González, Christoph Kleinn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Mathematics 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,659,707
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#800
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,060
of 449,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.