↓ Skip to main content

Values for rooted-tree and sink-tree digraph games and sharing a river

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Values for rooted-tree and sink-tree digraph games and sharing a river
Published in
Theory and Decision, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11238-009-9141-7
Authors

Anna B. Khmelnitskaya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#64
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,142
of 93,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.