↓ Skip to main content

Multi-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data in a registration framework

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Multi-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data in a registration framework
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9670-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hengameh Mirzaalian, Lipeng Ning, Peter Savadjiev, Ofer Pasternak, Sylvain Bouix, Oleg Michailovich, Sarina Karmacharya, Gerald Grant, Christine E. Marx, Rajendra A. Morey, Laura A. Flashman, Mark S. George, Thomas W. McAllister, Norberto Andaluz, Lori Shutter, Raul Coimbra, Ross D. Zafonte, Mike J. Coleman, Marek Kubicki, Carl-Fredrik Westin, Murray B. Stein, Martha E. Shenton, Yogesh Rathi

Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) data acquired on different scanners varies significantly in its content throughout the brain even if the acquisition parameters are nearly identical. Thus, proper harmonization of such data sets is necessary to increase the sample size and thereby the statistical power of neuroimaging studies. In this paper, we present a novel approach to harmonize dMRI data (the raw signal, instead of dMRI derived measures such as fractional anisotropy) using rotation invariant spherical harmonic (RISH) features embedded within a multi-modal image registration framework. All dMRI data sets from all sites are registered to a common template and voxel-wise differences in RISH features between sites at a group level are used to harmonize the signal in a subject-specific manner. We validate our method on diffusion data acquired from seven different sites (two GE, three Philips, and two Siemens scanners) on a group of age-matched healthy subjects. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method by statistically comparing diffusion measures such as fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and generalized fractional anisotropy across these sites before and after data harmonization. Validation was also done on a group oftest subjects, which were not used to "learn" the harmonization parameters. We also show results using TBSS before and after harmonization for independent validation of the proposed methodology. Using synthetic data, we show that any abnormality in diffusion measures due to disease is preserved during the harmonization process. Our experimental results demonstrate that, for nearly identical acquisition protocol across sites, scanner-specific differences in the signal can be removed using the proposed method in a model independent manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Master 14 14%
Professor 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 20%
Engineering 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Computer Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,406,219
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#1,008
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,840
of 420,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.