↓ Skip to main content

Meditators and Non-Meditators: EEG Source Imaging During Resting

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Meditators and Non-Meditators: EEG Source Imaging During Resting
Published in
Brain Topography, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10548-009-0107-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shisei Tei, Pascal L. Faber, Dietrich Lehmann, Takuya Tsujiuchi, Hiroaki Kumano, Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui, Lorena R. R. Gianotti, Kieko Kochi

Abstract

Many meditation exercises aim at increased awareness of ongoing experiences through sustained attention and at detachment, i.e., non-engaging observation of these ongoing experiences by the intent not to analyze, judge or expect anything. Long-term meditation practice is believed to generalize the ability of increased awareness and greater detachment into everyday life. We hypothesized that neuroplasticity effects of meditation (correlates of increased awareness and detachment) would be detectable in a no-task resting state. EEG recorded during resting was compared between Qigong meditators and controls. Using LORETA (low resolution electromagnetic tomography) to compute the intracerebral source locations, differences in brain activations between groups were found in the inhibitory delta EEG frequency band. In the meditators, appraisal systems were inhibited, while brain areas involved in the detection and integration of internal and external sensory information showed increased activation. This suggests that neuroplasticity effects of long-term meditation practice, subjectively described as increased awareness and greater detachment, are carried over into non-meditating states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 166 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Master 18 10%
Other 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Neuroscience 20 12%
Engineering 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,387,301
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#233
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,044
of 110,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.