Title |
Characteristics of Children and Adolescents Admitted to a Residential Treatment Center
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Child and Family Studies, December 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:jcfs.0000044730.66750.57 |
Authors |
Daniel F. Connor, Leonard A. Doerfler, Peter F. Toscano, Adam M. Volungis, Ronald J. Steingard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 50 | 44% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,218,493
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#267
of 1,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,216
of 155,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them