| Title |
A new statistical procedure for testing equivalence in two-group comparative bioavailability trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, February 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01063612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter W. Hauck, Sharon Anderson |
| Abstract |
The clinical problem of testing for equivalence in comparative bioavailability trials is restated in terms of the proper statistical hypotheses. A simple t-test procedure for these hypotheses has been developed that is more powerful than the methods based on usual (shortest) and symmetric confidence intervals. In this note, this new procedure is explained and an example is given, including the method for sample size determination. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 31% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#62
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,421
of 35,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them