↓ Skip to main content

Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and Palate: 9. Parental report of social and emotional experiences related to their 5-year-old child's cleft diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plastic Surgery & Hand Surgery, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and Palate: 9. Parental report of social and emotional experiences related to their 5-year-old child's cleft diagnosis
Published in
Journal of Plastic Surgery & Hand Surgery, February 2017
DOI 10.1080/2000656x.2016.1254643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Billaud Feragen, Nichola Rumsey, Arja Heliövaara, Betty Marie Boysen, Emma Christine Johannessen, Christina Havstam, Agneta Marcusson, Jill Nyberg, Nina-Helen Pedersen, Joan Bogh-Nielsen, Philip Eyres, Eileen Bradbury, Gunvor Semb

Abstract

Parents of children with a cleft lip and palate may be emotionally affected by the child's diagnosis. Their experiences and perceptions are important when evaluating the complexity of satisfactory treatment outcomes. The objective was to examine parents' social and emotional experiences related to their child's cleft diagnosis, and their perceptions of the child's adjustment to living with a visible difference. International multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and the UK. A cohort of 448 children born with a non-syndromic UCLP were included. A total of 356 parents completed the Scandcleft Parent Questionnaire. The majority of parents experienced practical and emotional support from family, friends, and health professionals. Nevertheless, parents had to cope with other people's reactions to the cleft, experiences that were described as ranging from hurtful to neutral and/or positive. According to parents, 39% of the children had experienced cleft-related comments and/or teasing. More than half of the parents reported specific worries related to their child's future. While the majority of the parents experienced positive support and coped well with the child's diagnosis, some parents were at risk for psychological and emotional challenges that should be identified by the cleft team. To optimise outcomes and the child's adjustment, these parents should be offered psychological support when necessary. ISRCTN29932826.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#17,490,079
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plastic Surgery & Hand Surgery
#254
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,655
of 323,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plastic Surgery & Hand Surgery
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.