↓ Skip to main content

A cytoskeletal basis for wood formation in angiosperm trees: the involvement of cortical microtubules

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A cytoskeletal basis for wood formation in angiosperm trees: the involvement of cortical microtubules
Published in
Planta, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004250050530
Authors

Nigel Chaffey, John Barnett, Peter Barlow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 45%
Professor 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 70%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Materials Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,121,663
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#103
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,415
of 35,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.