| Title |
Subjective satiety and other experiences of a Paleolithic diet compared to a diabetes diet in patients with type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tommy Jönsson, Yvonne Granfeldt, Staffan Lindeberg, Ann-Christine Hallberg |
| Abstract |
We found marked improvement of glycemic control and several cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes given advice to follow a Paleolithic diet, as compared to a diabetes diet. We now report findings on subjective ratings of satiety at meal times and participants' other experiences of the two diets from the same study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 16% |
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
| Scientists | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Researcher | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 83 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#484,960
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#154
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,466
of 210,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.