↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of infants <28 days old treated with peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Outcomes of infants <28 days old treated with peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00467-009-1234-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle N. Rheault, Jurat Rajpal, Blanche Chavers, Thomas E. Nevins

Abstract

This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of infants with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who required initiation of chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) prior to 28 days of age. Infants with ESRD present both ethical and technical challenges for pediatric nephrologists and neonatologists. Recent advances in the medical management of ESRD in infants combined with improved infant transplantation outcomes make it more likely that such infants can survive to successful kidney transplantation. We reviewed all infants initiating PD for ESRD before 28 days of age at the University of Minnesota Amplatz Children's Hospital from 1995 to 2004 (n = 23). Overall 1 - and 5-year patient survival was 52 and 48%, respectively. Twelve children received kidney transplants at a median age and weight of 1.12 years and 9.5 kg, respectively, with a 5-year graft survival rate of 83%. In summary, a majority of infants requiring renal replacement therapy with PD in the first month of life achieve long-term survival with a successful kidney transplant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 8 30%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#3,644
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,969
of 123,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.