↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Dispersive Action of Nanocellulose for Carbon Nanomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the Dispersive Action of Nanocellulose for Carbon Nanomaterials
Published in
Nano Letters, February 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alireza Hajian, Stefan B. Lindström, Torbjörn Pettersson, Mahiar M. Hamedi, Lars Wågberg

Abstract

This work aims at understanding the excellent ability of nanocelluloses to disperse carbon nanomaterials (CNs) in aqueous media to form long-term stable colloidal dispersions without the need for chemical functionalization of the CNs or the use of surfactant. These dispersions are useful for composites with high CN content when seeking water-based, efficient and green pathways for their preparation. To establish a comprehensive understanding of such dispersion mechanism, colloidal characterization of the dispersions has been combined with surface adhesion measurements using colloidal probe atomic force microscopy (AFM) in aqueous media. AFM results based on model surfaces of graphene and nanocellulose further suggest that there is an association between the nanocellulose and the CN. This association is caused by fluctuations of the counterions on the surface of the nanocellulose inducing dipoles in the sp2 carbon lattice surface of the CNs. Furthermore, the charges on the nanocellulose will induce an electrostatic stabilization of the nanocellulose-CN complexes that prevents aggregation. Based on this understanding, nanocelluloses with high surface charge density was used to disperse and stabilize carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and reduced graphene oxide in water and further increase in the dispersion limit of CNTs could be obtained. The dispersion limit reached the value of 75 wt % CNTs and resulted in high electrical conductivity (515 S/cm) and high modulus (14 GPa) of the CNT composite nanopapers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 56 25%
Engineering 38 17%
Chemistry 36 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Chemical Engineering 8 4%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,469,399
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#5,276
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,733
of 426,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#88
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.