↓ Skip to main content

Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004210050033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabien A. Basset, Marcel R. Boulay

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the viability of using a single test in which cardiorespiratory variables are measured, to establish training guidelines in running and/or cycling training activities. Six triathletes (two females and four males), six runners (two females and four males) and six males cyclists, all with 5.5 years of serious training and still involved in racing, were tested on a treadmill and cycle ergometer. Cardiorespiratory variables [e.g., heart rate (HR), minute ventilation, carbon dioxide output (VCO2)] were calculated relative to fixed percentages of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max; from 50 to 100%). The entire group of subjects had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values of VO2max on the treadmill compared with the cycle ergometer [mean (SEM) 4.7 (0.8) and 4.4 (0.9) l.min-1, respectively], and differences between tests averaged 10.5% for runners, 6.1% for triathletes and 2.8% for cyclists. A three-way analysis of variance using a 3 x 2 x 6 design (groups x tests x intensities) demonstrated that all factors yielded highly significant F-ratios (P < 0.05) for all variables between tests, even though differences in HR were only 4 beats.min-1. When HR was plotted against a fixed percentage of VO2max, a high correlation was found between tests. These results demonstrate that for triathletes, cyclists and runners, the relationship between HR and percentage of VO2max, obtained in either a treadmill or a cycle ergometer test, may be used independently of absolute VO2max to obtain reference HR values that can be used to monitor their running and/or cycling training bouts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 183 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 20%
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 85 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,884
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,905
of 109,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.