You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organizing phenological data resources to inform natural resource conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.003 |
| Authors |
Alyssa H. Rosemartin, Theresa M. Crimmins, Carolyn A.F. Enquist, Katharine L. Gerst, Jherime L. Kellermann, Erin E. Posthumus, Ellen G. Denny, Patricia Guertin, Lee Marsh, Jake F. Weltzin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,935
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,774
of 242,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.