| Title |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2767-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Berci, John Hunter, Leon Morgenstern, Maurice Arregui, Michael Brunt, Brandon Carroll, Michael Edye, David Fermelia, George Ferzli, Frederick Greene, Joseph Petelin, Edward Phillips, Jeffrey Ponsky, Harry Sax, Steven Schwaitzberg, Nathaniel Soper, Lee Swanstrom, William Traverso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,053,603
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#339
of 6,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,541
of 291,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#3
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.