| Title |
A study of psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery: what differentiates expert and nonexpert performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2524-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erlend Fagertun Hofstad, Cecilie Våpenstad, Magdalena Karolina Chmarra, Thomas Langø, Esther Kuhry, Ronald Mårvik |
| Abstract |
A high level of psychomotor skills is required to perform minimally invasive surgery (MIS) safely. To assure high quality of skills, it is important to be able to measure and assess these skills. For that, it is necessary to determine aspects that indicate the difference between performances at various levels of proficiency. Measurement and assessment of skills in MIS are best done in an automatic and objective way. The goal of this study was to investigate a set of nine motion-related metrics for their relevance to assess psychomotor skills in MIS during the performance of a labyrinth task. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,342,133
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,735
of 6,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,909
of 172,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#68
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,007 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.