You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fit or Unfit : Analysis and Prediction of 'Closed Questions' on Stack Overflow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
arXiv, July 2013
|
| Authors |
Denzil Correa, Ashish Sureka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 54 | 69% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,280,178
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#98,477
of 915,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,906
of 210,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#516
of 9,091 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,091 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.