↓ Skip to main content

De-bugging and maximizing plant cytochrome P450 production in Escherichia coli with C-terminal GFP fusions

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
De-bugging and maximizing plant cytochrome P450 production in Escherichia coli with C-terminal GFP fusions
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-016-8076-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulla Christensen, Dario Vazquez-Albacete, Karina M. Søgaard, Tonja Hobel, Morten T. Nielsen, Scott James Harrison, Anders Holmgaard Hansen, Birger Lindberg Møller, Susanna Seppälä, Morten H. H. Nørholm

Abstract

Cytochromes P450 (CYP) are attractive enzyme targets in biotechnology as they catalyze stereospecific C-hydroxylations of complex core skeletons at positions that typically are difficult to access by chemical synthesis. Membrane bound CYPs are involved in nearly all plant pathways leading to the formation of high-value compounds. In the present study, we systematically maximize the heterologous expression of six different plant-derived CYP genes in Escherichia coli, using a workflow based on C-terminal fusions to the green fluorescent protein. The six genes can be over-expressed in both K- and B-type E. coli strains using standard growth media. Furthermore, sequences encoding a small synthetic peptide and a small bacterial membrane anchor markedly enhance the expression of all six genes. For one of the CYPs, the length of the linker region between the predicted N-terminal transmembrane segment and the soluble domain is modified, in order to verify the importance of this region for enzymatic activity. The work describes how membrane bound CYPs are optimally produced in E. coli and thus adds this plant multi-membered key enzyme family to the toolbox for bacterial cell factory design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 14 20%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Chemistry 6 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,296,926
of 24,255,619 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,510
of 8,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,461
of 462,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#53
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,255,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,064 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.