| Title |
On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1007711416843 |
| Authors |
JANE BEATTIE*, JUDITH COVEY, PAUL DOLAN, LORRAINE HOPKINS, MICHAEL JONES-LEE, GRAHAM LOOMES, NICK PIDGEON, ANGELA ROBINSON, ANNE SPENCER |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 31% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 23% |
| Psychology | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#190
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,233
of 32,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.