↓ Skip to main content

Deception: a functional account

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Deception: a functional account
Published in
Philosophical Studies, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0883-8
Authors

Marc Artiga, Cédric Paternotte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 38%
Philosophy 3 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,187,574
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#429
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,351
of 307,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.