↓ Skip to main content

Long-term benefits of radon spa therapy in rheumatic diseases: results of the randomised, multi-centre IMuRa trial

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Long-term benefits of radon spa therapy in rheumatic diseases: results of the randomised, multi-centre IMuRa trial
Published in
Rheumatology International, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00296-013-2819-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franke Annegret, Franke Thomas

Abstract

In chronic rheumatic diseases, recent treatment regimens comprise multimodal concepts including pharmacologic, physical/exercise, occupational and psychological therapies. Rehabilitation programmes are used for long-term management of disease. Spa therapy is often integrated in various middle and south European and Asian countries. Here, we investigated radon spa therapy as applied in health resorts compared to a control intervention in rheumatic out-patients. Randomised, blinded trial enroling 681 patients [mean age 58.3 (standard deviation 11.1); female 59.7%] in 7 health resorts in Germany and Austria with chronic back pain (n 1 = 437), osteoarthritis (OA) (n 2 = 230), rheumatoid arthritis (n 3 = 98), and/or ankylosing spondylitis (n 4 = 39); multiple nominations in 146 cases). Outcomes were pain (primary), quality of life, functional capacity, and medication measured before start, after end of treatment, and 3 times thereafter in 3 monthly intervals. Adverse events were documented. To analyse between-group differences, repeated-measures analysis of covariance was performed in metric endpoints and Fisher's exact test in rates. Two-sided significance level of 5% was chosen. Until end of follow-up, superiority of radon therapy was found regarding pain relief (p = 0.032) and analgesic drug consumption (p = 0.007), but not regarding quality of life. Functional capacity was assessed specific to the underlying indication. Significant benefits were found in radon-treated OA patients until 6-month follow-up (p = 0.05), but not until end of study (p = 0.096). Neither the back pain sub-population nor the two smaller patient populations with inflammatory indications benefited significantly in functional capacity. Results suggest beneficial analgesic effects of radon spa therapy in rheumatic diseases until 9 months post-intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 57 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 62 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,140,111
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#54
of 2,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,232
of 198,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.