Title |
Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, March 1995
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00307281 |
Authors |
Mark S. Ghiorso, Richard O. Sack |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 595 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 157 | 25% |
Researcher | 111 | 18% |
Student > Master | 77 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 35 | 6% |
Other | 106 | 17% |
Unknown | 84 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 422 | 69% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 2% |
Unspecified | 10 | 2% |
Engineering | 10 | 2% |
Computer Science | 4 | <1% |
Other | 22 | 4% |
Unknown | 134 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,457,650
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#71
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,981
of 23,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them