| Title |
For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sander Greenland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 30 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Scientists | 14 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 27% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 26% |
| Psychology | 30 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#940,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#138
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,226
of 327,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.