↓ Skip to main content

Functional habitat area as a reliable proxy for population size: case study using two butterfly species of conservation concern

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Conservation, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Functional habitat area as a reliable proxy for population size: case study using two butterfly species of conservation concern
Published in
Journal of Insect Conservation, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10841-010-9269-3
Authors

Camille Turlure, Julie Choutt, Hans Van Dyck, Michel Baguette, Nicolas Schtickzelle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Hungary 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 75 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 54%
Environmental Science 20 24%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#267
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,685
of 167,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.