↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for Developing Management Goals for Species at Risk with Examples from Military Installations in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A Framework for Developing Management Goals for Species at Risk with Examples from Military Installations in the United States
Published in
Environmental Management, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9385-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Efroymson, Henriette Jager, Virginia Dale, James Westervelt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 37%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 43%
Environmental Science 7 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Design 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,505
of 105,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.