↓ Skip to main content

Scheduling with package auctions

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Economics, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Scheduling with package auctions
Published in
Experimental Economics, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10683-010-9252-6
Authors

Kan Takeuchi, John C. Lin, Yan Chen, Thomas A. Finholt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 32%
Engineering 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#154
of 338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,942
of 94,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.