↓ Skip to main content

The Value of Interrupted Time-Series Experiments for Community Intervention Research

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
493 Mendeley
Title
The Value of Interrupted Time-Series Experiments for Community Intervention Research
Published in
Prevention Science, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1010024016308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Biglan, Dennis Ary, Alexander C. Wagenaar

Abstract

Greater use of interrupted time-series experiments is advocated for community intervention research. Time-series designs enable the development of knowledge about the effects of community interventions and policies in circumstances in which randomized controlled trials are too expensive, premature, or simply impractical. The multiple baseline time-series design typically involves two or more communities that are repeatedly assessed, with the intervention introduced into one community at a time. It is particularly well suited to initial evaluations of community interventions and the refinement of those interventions. This paper describes the main features of multiple baseline designs and related repeated-measures time-series experiments, discusses the threats to internal validity in multiple baseline designs, and outlines techniques for statistical analyses of time-series data. Examples are given of the use of multiple baseline designs in evaluating community interventions and policy changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 469 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 18%
Researcher 78 16%
Student > Master 73 15%
Other 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Other 106 22%
Unknown 71 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 22%
Social Sciences 91 18%
Psychology 69 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 101 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,624,006
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#91
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,105
of 41,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them