| Title |
Evidence of the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention following first episode psychosis: a naturalistic prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-009-0034-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barnaby S. Major, Mark F. Hinton, Amy Flint, Anna Chalmers-Brown, Katharine McLoughlin, Sonia Johnson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,318
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,716
of 96,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.