↓ Skip to main content

Comparative toxicology of borates

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Comparative toxicology of borates
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/bf02783147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan A. Hubbard

Abstract

Inorganic borates, including boric acid, Na, ammonium, K, and Zn borates generally display low acute toxicity orally, dermally, and by inhalation. They are either not irritant or mild skin and eye irritants. Exceptions owing to physiochemical properties do occur. Longer-term toxicological studies have been reported mainly on boric acid or borax where the properties are generally similar on an equivalent boron (B) basis. The critical effects in several species are male reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity. The doses that cause these effects are far higher than any levels to which the human population could be exposed. Humans would need to consume daily some 3.3 g of boric acid (or 5.0 g borax) to ingest the same dose level as the lowest animal NOAEL. No effects on fertility were seen in a population of workers exposed to borates or to a population exposed to high environmental borate levels. There is remarkable similarity in the toxicological effects of boric acid and borax across different species. Other inorganic borates that simply dissociate to boric acid are expected to display similar toxicity, whereas those that do not dissociate simply to boric acid may display a different toxicological profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,144,699
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#157
of 2,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,202
of 307,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.